Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Display: Sort:
    Thank you for your input. (none / 0) (#3)
    by JGillman on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 12:18:10 PM EST
    On Exchanges (none / 0) (#4)
    by JGillman on Fri Jul 15, 2011 at 12:36:58 PM EST
    Could these exchanges allow participation by out of state companies, thus expanding the range of choices for consumers?  If not why would we limit ourselves in such a way?

    Why must we have an exchange, a new bureaucracy, to buy a product?

    What business is it of government what insurance we buy?  Why would we complicate such things?  Couldn't the insurance be deductible in the same way anyhow?

    Of course it could.

    Which gets back to my point about telling the feds to cliff jump.

    I am absolutely sure the Senator is doing what he feels is best for the state, but in the process of all the feel good rhetoric about what it will do FOR US, we are missing what it continues to do TO US.

    The Supreme court is not the last authority on this.  The states are.

    Having said that .. IF the exchange is created, and has little or no cost, has little or no requirement to participate, and has little or no real effect on those who do not wish to participate, then it is merely an Ebay of insurance and I welcome a new opportunity.

    BUT

    As anything created by government in the past has taught us, looking before leaping is prudent.  Further, entrenched bureaucracies are impossible to remove, and tend to have mission creep as their first objectives.

    Parent

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search