Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Display: Sort:
    Execution is the issue (none / 0) (#14)
    by Seth9 on Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 02:53:54 AM EST
    I'm not going to claim that governments do a good job at implementing green energy technologies. Like many government infrastructure initiatives, they often involve massive inefficiencies from a technical and financial standpoint. This does not, however, mean that green energy always fails. In fact, when constructed properly, green energy systems can be much better than conventional systems over the long term from a financial standpoint because traditional forms of green energy do not require any fuel, removing a major long term cost from the equation.

    With regard to your examples, I cannot adequately address your second or fourth examples because I know none of the specifics surrounding those projects. They appear to be poorly conceived, but without knowing more, I'm hesitant to write them off as idiotic ideas. As for the Scottish island, the problem with that project is that it is simply a bad idea to rely on weather-based phenomena to provide power in a small area. They appear to have not built any contingencies for an unusual shift in the weather, which is an indefensible practice from an engineering standpoint. And with regard to Spain, their energy costs will decrease over time, particularly because they now have an infrastructure of solar panels in place and solar technology is rapidly becoming more efficient and less expensive.

    With regard to batteries, I will once again note that batteries have many applications outside of alternative energy. Advanced batteries are now heavily integrated into the field of electronics and battery technology is also improving rapidly. And as the cost of oil is increasing, battery technology is improving, and the costs of advanced batteries are decreasing, it makes sense that battery-powered vehicles will be money makers in the relatively near future.

    And on a final note, it should be noted that even if Michigan vastly improves its business climate, we will still be competing with other states. And if other states offer incentives to industries that we want to come here, then we will have to offer incentives to those industries  in order to compete for them. As you noted in your article on LG's new plant, LG's Chem division is well run and makes over $11 billion in revenue on an annual basis, meaning that they can afford to pay $300 million for a plant. But the thing is, the reason they make a ton of money is that they keep their costs down by doing things like going to places where they get tax incentives when they build a plant. Michigan is competing with every other state in this country and the rest of the world too to attract industries. And many industries that would be interested in expanding to Michigan will get tax incentives in other states and countries, meaning that if Michigan is going to compete with them, then we need to offer at least a limited incentive if we're going to get them. And the industries that actually mesh well with the state's resources such as green energy companies are not going to come here without some type of tax incentive. And I'm hesitant to simply throw away that opportunity because we need industries to come here and use Michigan's abandoned factories because we have people here that can work there and we need these facilities to provide tax revenue to the state government again.

    Parent

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search