You are entitled to your opinion on this..
The bottom line is there is a very REAL possibility of Snyder pulling it off if his current plan works.
The endorsements themselves are NOT the issue. Its that we should recognize what is at stake.
And seriously, if you want to go there on being in error, or whether you will be playing nice, consider my words on Hoekstra have been nothing but fact, and no additional emphasis has been placed beyond that.
The point of their ad was to say they have ALSO recognized Hoekstra before, but in the bylaws they must make a decision. I agree with the logic of their decision. I also recognize that all of those endorsements Cox has received, were done with due diligence and consideration of ALL things.
I have made my argument. I may make more, but I have not been overly hard on Hoekstra.
AND as you know I understand the Fairtax argument, as I am also a supporter, however, I have also expressed my concerns about the "service" tax component, which would not work anyhow. Big problem there, and Cox has seen that, but MI Fair tax appears to have backed the Cox camp into the corner with their endorsement of Hoekstra, so NOW he must talk about it as a tax increase.
Parent
