Here is the deal.  We are imperfect.  We screw up, we fail.  It happens.  I have even looked on some of my own postings after the fact, and wondered why I let myself slip in a fashion that cheapens my otherwise decent work (inserting my own back pat here) in a way that is unnecessary.  I hope that the big picture and ALL of my work is seen on a balance that allows me to keep some respect from the readers though.

Think of it like currency.  Good work earns it, and its easily spent on reckless comments or poor analysis.  And yes.. sometimes a condescending tone taxes it as well, though I am really not trying to be that way..

My point is, I'll respond in the way I see it, and expect you will as well.  I have a great deal of respect for your work, and the time you have spent collecting and documenting the information and issues surrounding the power plant.  you have earned a TON of that currency.  I just hope you spend it right and hang in there with us to the end.

I have held off on heavy articles about any candidates so far.  And the only one I have wanted to spend any negative "ink" on has been Snyder. There are troubles I have with him both issue oriented and instinctual.  The other candidates will be addressed on issues only.. at least from me.