Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    Display: Sort:
    Let's get one thing straight . . . (none / 0) (#29)
    by Kevin Rex Heine on Tue May 12, 2009 at 10:50:38 PM EST
    . . . my response to the Angry White Male was based on his attack on Senator McManus' credibility based on a vote that really doesn't mean much.  At least it doesn't in my mind (for the reasons that I stated).  I get that Michelle isn't going to get it right every time, but I also know that I'm likely going to agree with her about 90% of the time; and in my mind, that makes her a friend and an ally, not a traitor.

    I oppose government overreach, PERIOD, regardless of who's overreaching.  And I'm just as ticked off at the Republicans as I am at the Democrats.  But I also know that the problem isn't so much one party over another as it is an institutionalized mindset.  Over the past seven generations (give or take), we've come to accept a greater government involvement in our day-to-day lives as a reality that we'll just have to figure out how to live with.  I view that mindset as a bathtub-sized crock of horse manure, and the TEA Party movement agrees with me.

    Not particularly surprisingly, income-based and business-based taxation are viewed as symbols of that overreach that many citizens are now realizing should be opposed by every legal means available.  The core of this resistance is based on the assertion (made back in 1964 . . . by a Democrat) that as long as the government retains the power to tax as they see fit, they can fund any government program that they desire to keep running.  For this reason (among others) I suspect that you are dead wrong in your belief that a graduated income tax is more likely to be approved by the Michigan electorate than a progressive consumption tax.

    The reasons that the Michigan FairTax Proposal is receiving widespread support are:

    1. It throws out the current state-level tax system and replaces it with a sales-tax-only system . . . with no loss of state revenue.  This is because everyone who buys retail in the state will become a taxpayer . . . including those who do not now pay income-based or business-based taxes.

    2. By being a sales-tax only system, the MFTP places everyone's true tax burden out where it can be plainly seen . . . on every sales receipt/invoice.  No more hiding of our tax burden in the form of income withholding or business taxes (that have to be passed on to customers, employees, and sharholders in order for business to remain profitable).

    3. The MFTP places the state tax system behind a constitutional firewall . . . so that no old tax can be resurrected, nor can a new tax be enacted, nor can the sales tax rate be raised, unless approved by the voters (in the form of a legislatively-referred ballot initiative).

    I have no problem with taxes per se.  Government does have its legitimate functions, and those functions do have to be funded.  My problem is with an unacceptably high tax burden to fund a government that has overgrown its britches.  And since that government will not willingly go on a diet, we're just going to have to cut back on the food supply.

    Parent

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search