Political News and Commentary with the Right Perspective. NAVIGATION
  • Front Page
  • News
  • Multimedia
  • Tags
  • RSS Feed


  • Advertise on RightMichigan.com


    NEWS TIPS!

    Get the RightMighigan.com toolbar!


    RightMichigan.com

    Buzz

    Who are the NERD fund donors Mr Snyder?

    Raise the curtain.

    RM Exclusive: Stem Cell committee exporting Michigan jobs, hundreds of thousands of dollars


    By Nick, Section News
    Posted on Fri Oct 10, 2008 at 01:16:01 PM EST
    Tags: (all tags)

    "It'll bring jobs.  It'll bring jobs as dollars become available to do the research.  And if intellectual properties are developed from this research, which I'm certain they will be, that will bring more jobs."

    That's the prognosis from Dr. Joe Schwarz, the one-time Congressman from Michigan's 7th District and the current front-man for Cure Michigan, the Proposal 2 ballot organization asking voters to legalize taxpayer funded destruction of human embryos via a rewrite of Michigan's current embryonic stem cell laws.  

    Schwarz made his proclamation during a September 9th discussion of the ballot proposal on Detroit radio WWJ's political roundtable program, Eye on Michigan Politics.  He echoed the oft-repeated claims of Prop 2 supporters who have taken a cue from Michigan's 8.9 percent unemployment rate and public opinion polls that consistently rank the economy the top issue in the state, choosing to market their initiative in terms of job creation.  Only a week ago he wrote a guest column in the Observer and Eccentric that put a number to his broader statements, stating Prop 2 will create "8,000" Michigan jobs.

    But while the campaign sells its issue as an answer to chronic joblessness, their walk doesn't match the talk.  A review of the ballot committee's "qualification" campaign finance filings with the Michigan Secretary of State indicates that while embryonic-stem-cell backers continue to spend major dollars advocating a Michigan job creation message, they've created plenty of new jobs already... in places like Arizona, Minnesota, Missouri and California.

    When Schwarz made his claims he joined a chorus of Prop 2 backers who use the debate over public financing of the destruction of human embryos to paint themselves as job creators.  Liberal columnist (and hero of the Michigan left) Jack Lessenberry was an early champion of the "jobs" argument when in July he penned a propaganda piece titled, subtly, "Jobs depend on victory in stem cell debate."  Even Jennifer Granholm has gone on the record promulgating their claims.

    The Detroit Free Press and Crain's Detroit Business followed with articles discussing the prospects of creating hundreds of new jobs, should Michigan eliminate the prohibition on taxpayer funded human embryo destruction.  (It was months later that the campaign upped their claims from the low hundreds to the many thousands.)  The articles discussed the alleged new jobs in terms defined by a study conducted by a liberal public policy front group, the Michigan Prospect.

    Cure Michigan's supporters refer to the Michigan Prospect report as an "independent" analysis and claim to have had no control over the outcome but records indicate the precursor to this year's Prop 2 ballot committee, Michigan Citizens for Stem Cell Research and Cures paid $24,000 to fund the study.

    As for their promise to create several hundred new jobs for unemployed Michiganders, the Anderson Economic Group's chief economist, Patrick Anderson, suggests any such assurances are off the mark.  In fact, the vast majority of any new jobs would be filled by non-michiganders.

    "I see minimal effect on new jobs in Michigan," said Anderson.  "We're talking about research activity that already goes on.  You not only can do stem cell research but we are doing stem cell research now.

    "If there were any jobs that arose from this, the majority of them would probably go to people who are outside the state right now and many of them would stay outside of the state.  This is a very specialized narrow area and we don't have a large pool of people in Michigan who can do this kind of work.  If in fact the taxpayers raised the money, a chunk of it is going to wind up going out of state, (too)."

    Simply put, the unemployment rate among geneticists and the other scientists and assistants skilled enough to conduct stem cell research and living in Michigan is virtually non-existent.  

    "The opportunities for Michigan to grow in this area are largely outside of embryonic stem cell research," said Anderson.  "It's because of all kinds of other skills that we have and if we want to grow jobs we ought to get out of an area where there are legal, moral and ethical restraints.  

    "This is a very inferior route to go if you want to improve jobs in Michigan, and if it's taxpayer funded I would argue it is a net job loss."

    That hasn't stopped Cure Michigan from campaigning on the promise of new jobs for Michigan's increasingly frustrated unemployed voters.  Armed with nothing but a bought-and-paid-for partisan analysis supporting their claims, while economists, industry statistics and common sense cover them in a heavy cloud of doubt there is only one place left to look for the truth of the committees promises; their own actions and employment decisions.

    On September 18th Cure Michigan complied with Michigan campaign finance requirements and filed their qualification finance statement.  According to their own internal reports, the ballot committee billing itself as a Michigan job maker spent more than a few test-tubes full of cash exporting Michigan jobs to eleven other states, including Arizona, California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New York and Ohio.

    Over the last nine months Cure Michigan has spent nearly a quarter of a million dollars exporting Michigan jobs.

    Victory Consultants of El Cajon, California received payments totaling over $30,000. Apparently there weren't any political consultants with experience winning Michigan elections anywhere in Michigan.  Sadly, exporting jobs Michiganders can and should have done didn't stop there.

    Wilcox and Offutt Consulting, LLC received thousands performing web development for the Michigan campaign, from Nevada.  Coral Springs, Florida cleaning company Anago Franchising took home big bucks too.  Even temp services were exported to a company called Office Team, in Chicago, Illinois.  They saw over $10,000 poured into their business instead of a similar Michigan based company.

    Many tens of thousands of additional dollars were spent hiring dozens of out of state "voter registrars" and petition managers to assist in the collection and verification of the petition signatures required for Proposal 2 to make the ballot.  

    Then we start getting into the big dollar purchases.  

    In their zeal to find the best ways to sell their proposal to Michigan voters, Cure Michigan brought on a Chicago based consulting agency to conduct focus groups. They spent nearly $35,000 on the Glengariff Group, Inc.  Apparently exporting Michigan jobs to Illinois is the best way to figure out how to convince Michigan voters you want to create jobs locally.

    All of that before the campaign began in earnest.  Now that it has, the number of Michigan jobs and dollars exported to other states is becoming even more staggering.  

    By now you've seen the television commercials. They're all over cable these days and boy do they look pretty.  They look professional.  Well made.  Well messaged.  And they should... they're the best out-of-state ads Michigan money can buy.  The wizard behind the advertising curtain is one Joe Slade White.

    If that name sounds familiar it should.  Mr. White and his media firm have been doing Vice Presidential candidate Joe Biden's ads in Delaware for years and they did the Michigan Democratic Party's ads in 2006.   The Joe Slade White Company is located in New York, New York with offices in Washington, D.C. and Texas.

    Handling the purchasing of ad space and time on Michigan airwaves is Texas firm the Davis Group.

    Telephone messages left with both the Davis Group and JSWCo regarding their work with Cure Michigan went unreturned but according to long-time press secretary and media consultant John Truscott (formerly of the Engler campaigns / administration and the DeVos for Governor campaign), the sorts of ads that are running on television today don't come cheap.

    "Especially in a Presidential election year, the cost to buy media goes up dramatically," said Truscott.  "Just look at the website.  Joe Slade White produces very expensive stuff."

    Truscott, who has not taken a formal position in support or opposition of Proposal 2, pegs the production costs of a simple thirty-second advertisement in the thousands of dollars.  JSWCo's location in New York only drives costs up further.  Also, the more complex the ad the more certain costs will reach into the tens of thousands per spot and the industry standard for the sort of work being done by the Davis Group is ten percent of the total media purchase.  In other words, over the course of the next four weeks, tens of thousands of additional dollars will be headed to both New York and Texas just to make their Michigan advertising campaign possible. Alternately, hundreds of thousands are expected to be spent in-state promoting the work of New Yorkers.

    Undoubtedly Cure Michigan will continue advertising their proposal as a cure to what ails the state's economy, despite the infinitesimally small jobless rate among those who stand to benefit the most.  Unfortunately for Michigan's unemployed, the campaign and their spokespeople are putting their money everywhere but where their mouths are.

    < Politics of Intimidation in the Workplace | Nothing like a little union intimidation to get your weekend going >


    Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit


    Display: Sort:
    Lots of jobs? Where did I hear this before? (none / 0) (#1)
    by geek49203 on Fri Oct 10, 2008 at 01:55:03 PM EST

    Where did I hear the "lots of new jobs" thing before?  Wait -- that's what the City of Detroit said when they brought in casino gambling!  Yessirree, we found out that there would be tons of jobs, that we'd see an "Atlantic City" Renaissance, that we'd have the next Vegas at our doorstep.

    Well, here we are, about a decade down the road, and we have one casino in bankruptcy, and Detroit's poverty issues are worse than ever.  

    The stem cell research issue -- the the lotto and casino gambling issues before it -- is yet another example of where we're asked to give up our moral values in exchange for the promise of prosperity.  

    No doubt the proverbial serpent in Genesis is amazed at what we've done with his example.  I can't wait until someone figures out that we can make tons of money if we legalize marijuana....

    Proposal 2 (none / 0) (#2)
    by hangmann747 on Fri Oct 10, 2008 at 05:00:49 PM EST
    Thanks Nick,

    It's another eye opener to the lefts attempts to bring the State and our Constitution down!  For those who what to read more about Proposal 2, heres the link. "Proposal 2-ballotlanguage"

    "The Doctrine of Original Intent"

    As Always Thanks for being involved, Many Blessings, Shane

    "Standing Strong" & "Closing Ranks"
    and still in the "Hunt For Red November""

    Nick, why would conservatives care (none / 0) (#3)
    by chetly on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 11:32:27 AM EST
    Why would conservatives care where they spend their money.  Sure, there's a small amount of irony here, but if these folks are truly the best or best priced.  And from a First Amendment perspective, out-of-state participation is reasonable, despite the irony of the left attacking it like they do when they don't like the politics of the petition (e.g. - when they attacked Ward Connerly for funding MCRI). And it doesn't answer the question of whether a yes or no vote helps or hurts Michigan.  Of course, there's an interesting dichotomy in the left's claim "stem cell research = job creation" but the opponents of stem cell research are dirty rotten liars for saying it = tax increases.  Both are speculative outcomes that are indirect, and neither is guaranteed from the actual text of the proposal.  

    But I think you're onto something here with campaign finance report and the out-of-state expenditures - but the issue is the number of small-time individuals from various other states that clearly were paid signature-gatherers. The dichotomy between this and MCRI (MCRI was careful to use only in-state gatherers, but heavily accused of "fraud") and Drolet's Dillon recall (Drolet initially disqualified for having a few out-of-district gatherers in his process (now on the ballot because of Consitutional challenge victory).  It's interesting to see the left decry out-of-area circulators, or "signature fraud", when there's pretty good evidence that there were a number of them here - although evidence of a nature sufficient to cause criminal investigations (which might not be Constitutional anyway) would require someone with serious time and money to sit down and analyze the petitions, and the challenge period is already theoretically passed.  But look at the reports - in the memo sub-items for the petition company you'll find the hundreds of signature gatherers recorded.  A number of them use out-of-state addresses - which raises the question, since at the time there was no Dillon-federal-ruling on use of out-of-area circulators Michigan law required a statement under oath that you were eligible to register in Michigan (implying residency) and that you were giving an accurate address.  So did some of these circulators provide inaccurate addresses (perjury, regardless of their residency, which is a nebulous issue)?  Of course, that would require reviewing tens of thousands of petition sheets -- but I have a good guess there are several.

    So the left doesn't mind playing fast and loose with the rules when they like the issue, but if anyone on the right so much as sneezes on a petition the left would love to throw them in jail and make a chilling example of them.

    The truth is, from a conservative (and honest liberal, I believe) point of view, there is a role for legitimate rules in the process to prevent bona fide fraud. There's a place for proper regulation and deregulation AT THE SAME TIME (wow, that doesn't fit the liberal script that that deregulation is evil and regulation good, nor does it really fit the conservative corrollary). And the truth is that MCRI was among the cleanest, most honest collection efforts ever run -- we knew we'd be scrutinized and that they'd accuse us falsely of stuff, which they did -- so we dotted every i and crossed t's.  I'd love to see a set of rules that was clear and precise and fair -- but alas, whatever rules there are will be bent and interpreted by some either way to their advantage.  There is no law ... only power, politics, and money.


    Chetly Zarko
    Outside Lansing & Oakland Politics

    geek49203 (none / 0) (#6)
    by Ed Burley on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 07:00:15 PM EST
    "I can't wait until someone figures out that we can make tons of money if we legalize marijuana...."

    What? You go from embryonic stem cell research to gambling to marijuana legalization, where's the connection?

    I get the jobs connection, but plain and simple you are confusing economics with social policy. Let me lay it out for you.

    Embryonic stem cell research involves the potential for killing human life, and doing so with funding from taxpayers. Gambling has to do with a zero-sum game, where one loses and another (the casino) wins; wealth is transferred through the gambling, only the casino wins.

    Marijuana legalization is another matter entirely. Are you going to argue that we should prohibit alcohol again? What about cigarettes? What makes marijuana either a threat to human life, or a zero-sum game? In fact, if marijuana was legal, like alcohol, it could be sold, at a profit, which, the last time I checked, was what FREE MARKET ECONOMICS is all about.

    Proposal 2 would create jobs, but they'd all be government funded jobs (or more rightly taxpayer-funded jobs). Casinos fund jobs through their "profits" which are assured as they take other's wealth in exchange for a good time. In actuality, I have no problems with legalized gambling, the real problem is when some dumbo loses their families savings trying to make the big kill. This is a prime example of "the love of money is the root of all evil."

    Marijuana legalization would do a lot of things for our economy. First, it would allow our governments to stop interdiction, which would save money AND free up resources for more REAL CRIMES. Secondly, crime would not have to be a part of the equation, since it would be legal. How many legal businesses participate in legal activities? Not many. Thirdly, it would put marijuana into a category where individuals would make money from the sale to people who wanted the product - free markets.

    Why do Republicans hate the free market so much?

    Correction (none / 0) (#7)
    by Ed Burley on Sat Oct 11, 2008 at 07:13:52 PM EST
    it should read, "how many legal businesses participate in ILLEGAL activities?"

    sorry for any confusion.

    Embryonic Stem Cells is a marketing game we lost. (none / 0) (#11)
    by John Galt on Sun Oct 12, 2008 at 09:41:49 PM EST
    Did you know that Embryonic Stem Cell research is not, in fact, illegal?  It's being done at laboratories throughout the United States.  With private money, the way it should be.

    Did you know that other types of non-embryonic stem cell research is being done with public funds?  Yep, but one area of research isn't being funded.

    This is a marketing game.  First, someone shortened the phrase to just "Stem Cell research" and they make it sound like all research is illegal.  It's educating voters with their first exposure to this stuff.  They're going to be tainted - and wrong - for a long, long time.

    Democrats and Liberals have a vision.  They can sell that vision, because it's hard to argue against an empty promise of a cripple walking again or curing alzheimers.  All marketing begins with a vision.  It's a shame this one was really well done.

    Whoops, thanks Nick! (none / 0) (#13)
    by John Galt on Mon Oct 13, 2008 at 06:54:06 PM EST
    I meant to end that on a more positive note.  But you made the point I forgot to make.  

    We know the truth, and we can spread the truth about these issues.

    Thanks man!

    Display: Sort:

    Login

    Make a new account

    Username:
    Password:
    Tweet along with RightMichigan by
    following us on Twitter HERE!
    create account | faq | search